Localised Search Is Not Necessarily Your Friend – Part 1

September 29, 2011 – 10:07 am

Guest blogger Amy Munice from Global B2B Communications writes:

Is today’s Internet your friend? Alas, for the typical EMDT reader, I have a mixed answer.


At about the same time as the first stirrings of the worldwide recession, the world’s search engines began to start favouring local companies. Localised search algorithms (among other changes) are a predominant part of the 200+ factors that affect a web page’s so-called ranking. (In subsequent columns, I will explain why I qualify the word ranking in the way that I do.) These algorithms assume that a searcher (i.e., your prospect) is more interested in finding local sources for whatever he or she is seeking.

Are search engines capable of sorting out the things you want to source on a global basis from what you want to source on the nearest corner? Based on repeated Googling experiments, I conclude, not necessarily.

For example, let’s say you are doing R&D for a new drug-eluting stent. For that, you may want to source a temperature and humidity data logger, a technology with which I am very familiar. I have worked with two data logger manufacturers—one with a good-enough low-priced offering; the other with units priced above what the market typically will bear and achieving a level of accuracy exceeding the requirements of most applications. I have also talked with most data logger manufacturers worldwide, with technologies at various points between the aforementioned extremes.

My curiosity about the search key phrase data logger was first piqued about four years ago. An editor of a high-profile health informatics publication had gushed on the phone to me about a very cool ultracompact data logger. The maker of this device was in Europe. Knowing that the services my 20+-year-old PR firm provides are key to worldwide lead generation, I decided to call this manufacturer and see if there was any interest in our services. During the course of my conversation with the company’s very capable VP of Marketing, she mentioned, as an aside, that they had absolutely no need for any services—PR or otherwise—to help in their search engine rankings because they were “always number one.”  As we continued talking, I Googled the term data logger and its permutations. This company did not appear on page one, two or three—where the average Googler would give up—or beyond. I mentioned this to her but she was adamant: “we are always number one!”


My experiments continued. (For those in the know about personalised search, please note that my experiments were done from the same laptop without any cookie cleaning in between experiments.) I have now Googled data logger in the following locales: Chicago, London, Oxford, Paris, near Scotland, Bogota, Recife, New Orleans, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, San Francisco, Fresno, someplace in the redwood forests where connections were spotty, and along roads between X and Y. What I get when I Google changes. Yes, these are not clean experiments as they are not done at the same time but, rather, are stretched over time, but . . .

That said, Google (or Baidu, Bing Yahoo and so forth) do have localised search algorithms that work wonderfully for my local grocer, but not so well for anyone selling or sourcing more technical products online.

How to sell online? Look for some beginning answers in part two of this article next week. Sneak preview: Directories such as Qmed count for a lot more than you might initially think.

Amy Munice, Global B2B Communications

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Tags: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
  1. 5 Responses to “Localised Search Is Not Necessarily Your Friend – Part 1”

  2. Hi Amy,

    You write: “These algorithms assume that a searcher (i.e., your prospect) is more interested in finding local sources for whatever he or she is seeking.”

    Isn’t that generally a valid premise? It certainly complicates SEO but I see why Google would create an algorithm to reflect local data.

    By Brian Buntz on Sep 29, 2011

  3. Brian– Thanks for your comment–Here’s how I see it..

    I do not want to go to Bangkok for Thai food–even though it IS better perhaps, than my take-out place on the corner.

    If I had COPD, or diabetes or any medical condition where a state-of-the-art medical device could deliver me quality of life or even add to my years…I’d like to be able to source it easily.

    If I am making such devices –and I want the best technology match for my application– I DO want to be able to see what the world has to offer. Shipping costs may tip the balance to the local supplier; superior technology that allows me to create a better product and/or do so at lower cost may take away all “home court advantage”.

    Thank goodness for the likes of the QMed directory– for MANY industries– because reputable trade media worldwide are helping to bridge the Himalayan high obstacles to worldwide sourcing that developed as if under cover of night– JUST when some were saying “the world is flat”…

    By Amy on Oct 6, 2011

  1. 3 Trackback(s)

  2. Sep 29, 2011: Localised Search Is Not Necessarily Your Friend – From … | Find Friends
  3. Oct 18, 2011: medtechinsider » Blog Archive » Localised Search Is Not Necessarily Your Friend – Part 2
  4. Apr 8, 2012: Google’s Click-to-Teleport April Fools Day — Window to Google Blind Spot | Global B2B Communications

Post a Comment